• Home
  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Key Concepts
  • 9.3 Normal Earnings
  • 9.4 AEG
  • 9.5 Cost of Capital
  • 9.6 Implied Equivalence: IBM
  • 9.7 Residual Income
  • 9.8 Entering Data via Excel
  • 9.9 Forecasting Price
  • 9.10 Sensitivity Analysis
  • 9.11 Conclusions
  • 9.12 Questions

9.10 Sensitivity Analysis

By how much do we need change the value of key inputs to make IBM’s assessed value more consistent with the market price? 

Your goal is to understand the underlying economics of the company you are valuing in terms of how from the firm side the firm’s business model and strategy impact upon your assessments.  For example, the AEG model may be better suited for IBM than the RIV model because IBM’s business model has evolved to emphasize service and providing complete solutions to their clients.  As a result, taking into account the shift in IBM’s strategy described in Item 1 of the 10-K (see the introduction to this chapter), because IBM’s operations are better described from earnings as opposed to assets on their balance sheet.  The fundamental growth example, provided in the introduction, reinforced these insights.

The calculator lets you do this and we leave as an exercise for you to change the current IBM example to see how sensitive important derived variables such as expected return are to changes in input variables.

 

Copyright © 2011 OS Financial Trading System. All Rights Reserved.